M & S STEEL COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the company violated the National Labor Relations Act by prohibiting union literature distribution and interrogating an employee, and that the Board's order was valid.
M & S Steel Company petitioned to review an order from the National Labor Relations Board. The Board found the company violated the Act by prohibiting…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Restraint cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
In this case, M & S Steel Company, Incorporated filed its petition to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., (§ 10(f) of the Act).
In answer the Board has requested enforcement of its order. The Board concluded that the company violated § 8(a) (1) of the Act by (1) promulgating a rule which prohibited its employees from distributing union liter ature on their own time in non-working areas of the plant; and (2) interrogating employee Tommie Williams concerning his protected activities in such fashion as to constitute interference, restraint, and coercion within the meaning of the Act. The Board also found that the company violated § 8(a) (1), (3) and (4) of the Act by discriminatorily discharging Williams because of his union activities and his resort to the Board for assistance.
It is our conclusion that the record as a whole amply supports the findings and conclusions of the Board, and that the Board’s order is valid and proper. See Republic Aviation Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 324 U.S. 793, 803, n. 10, 65 S.Ct. 982, 988, 89 L.Ed. 1372, 1379; N. L. R. B. v. Walton Mfg. Co. (5 Cir.) 289 F. 2d 177, 180; N. L. R. B. v. Griggs Equipment (5 Cir.) 307 F. 2d 275, 278; Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Div., etc. v. N. L. R. B. (5 Cir.) 310 F. 2d 676, 679; N. L. R. B. v. Ewell Engineering & Contracting Co. (5 Cir.) 315 F. 2d 375. Accordingly, the petition to review is denied, and the Board’s order is enforced.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener, 405 U.S. 117 (U.S. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 324 U.S. 793 (U.S. 1945)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Griggs Equip., Inc., 307 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1962)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Walton Mfg. Co., 289 F.2d 177 (5th Cir. 1961)
- Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Div. of United Aircraft Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 310 F.2d 676 (5th Cir. 1962)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ewell Eng'g & Contracting Co., Inc., 315 F.2d 375 (5th Cir. 1963)