FRANCISCO MARTINEZ FRAGA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1983-09-08
No. 83-314
COBB, FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.
437 So. 2d 737 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979).

COBB, FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (holding that the trial court was correct in declaring all absentee ballots invalid and ousting the appellant from the office of clerk of the circuit court as a result, based upon the machine vote); McLean v. Bellamy, 437 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (“the machine votes shall solely determine the election results” as a proper remedy for absentee ballot fraud). We are mindful of the fact that the trial court found there was no evidence that Mr. Suarez knew of, or in any way p…
    1 / 2
  • Jacobs v. Seminole Cnty. Canvassing Bd., 773 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 2000)
    …tment of absentee ballots which do not contain all of the information required on the ballot. Section 101.68(2), Florida Statutes specifically provides that a ballot that fails to include the statutory elements is illegal.... [In McLean v. Bellamy, 437 So. 2d 737, 742-743 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), the court stated: Our examination of Section 101.62 leads us to conclude that its provisions are directory. We are unable to glean from the provision of that section a legislative intent that the failure to follow the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw