JOHNNY RAY OWENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Johnny Ray Owens was convicted of robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The Florida appellate court reversed and remanded because the trial judge erroneously refused to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of aggravated assault, despite evidence and pleading supporting such an instruction.
The court held that it was reversible error to deny the requested instruction on aggravated assault. The court found that all essential elements of aggravated assault were set forth in the information (assault and use of a deadly weapon) and supported by the evidence, making the instruction mandatory.
[1] A jury instruction on a category (2) lesser included offense is required if the accusatory pleading alleges all of its essential elements and the evidence supports it.
[2] An information alleging an assault and the carrying of a deadly weapon sufficiently alleges the essential elements of aggravated assault.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“An aggravated assault is an assault with a deadly weapon without intent to kill or an assault with intent to commit a felony.”
Defines the offense at issue and establishes it as a potential lesser included offense of robbery
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOwens was charged with robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. At trial, evidence was presented supporting a convicti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Aggravated Assault Elements cases and more on FLexlaw
HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge.
The appellant, Johnny Ray Owens, appeals from convictions after jury trial of the crimes of robbery with a firearm in violation of section 812.13, Florida Statutes (1981), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of section 790.-23, Florida Statutes (1981). We reverse and remand.
The first point raised by appellant is that the trial judge committed reversible error by failing to instruct the jury upon request timely made on the lesser included offense of aggravated assault. We agree.
The court in Brown v. State, 206 So. 2d 377 (Fla.1968), established four discret categories of attempts and lesser offenses upon which the jury may be instructed. The Supreme Court of Florida has recently consolidated the four categories into two:
(1) Offenses necessarily included in the offense charged, which will include some lesser degrees of offenses. (2) Offenses which may or may not be included in the offense charged, depending on the accu satory pleading and the evidence, which will include all attempts and some lesser degrees of offenses.
In the Matter of the Use of the Trial Courts of the Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases and the Standard Jury Instructions in Misdemeanor Cases, Nos. 56,734 and 58,799 (Fla. April 16, 1981).
An aggravated assault is an assault with a deadly weapon without intent to kill or an assault with intent to commit a felony. § 784.021, Fla.Stat. (1981). It is a category (2) lesser offense of robbery. Jackson v. State, 355 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 361 So. 2d 835 (Fla.1978); Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) Schedule of Lesser Included Offenses. That is, it may be a lesser included offense if the information alleges all of its essential elements and if the evidence supports it. State v. Terry, 336 So. 2d 65 (Fla.1976).
At the charge conference in the instant case, the trial judge determined that although the evidence presented at trial supported aggravated assault, the essential elements of aggravated assault were not alleged in the information.
We have made a careful review of the information and find that the essential elements of aggravated assault are set forth. The information expressly alleges an assault and also alleges the use of a deadly weapon. The fact that the information alleges that appellant “carried a deadly weapon” rather than “used a deadly weapon” does not nullify an essential element of aggravated assault. Thus, all the essential elements of an aggravated assault are alleged, as well as supported by the evidence. It was reversible error to deny the requested instruction.
Because we have ruled in the appellant’s favor on the first issue raised on appeal, we need not consider appellant’s second point.
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.
RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Owens v. State, 444 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…PER CURIAM. On November 16, 1983, the state filed a motion to recall and modify mandate which was issued on October 4, 1983, in the case of Owens v. State, 437 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). The state alleged in its motion that after the time period for filing a motion for rehearing had expired, the case of Vitko v. State, 363 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), came to the state’s attention. The state further alleged that…
Authorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 206 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1968)
- State v. Terry, 336 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1976)
- Jackson v. State, 355 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)