RONALD JOSEPH SELINKA, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fran T. Brown v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Jacobs & Goodman, P.A., 633 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
  …rsen-sitive, Uniweld Products, Inc. v. Industrial Relations Commission, Florida Department of Commerce, 277 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973),4 and this court can say what is reasonable and what is not. In Tannariello v. Federation of Public Employees, 437 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), the employee, “afraid” of future harm due to the location of her work environment, quit her job and sought unemployment. As in this ease, the appeals referee in Tannariello called the employee’s attitude “supersensitive” and fou…
• Wall v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 682 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …ncluded that, when coupled with the potential health problems (although admittedly mostly resolved), appellant’s concern for her personal safety was reasonable and that such constituted good cause under Tannariello v. Federation of Public Employees, 437 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Accordingly, the appeals referee held that appellant was not disqualified from benefits. The UAC erroneously reversed this part of the claim. Good cause is cause which “would reasonably impel the average able-bodied qualified w…
• Hall v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Laro, 697 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
  …ided that a claimant was justified in resigning her job based on personal safety fears where it was shown that the office had been burglarized numerous times and the neighborhood was unsafe. Finally, in Tannariello v. Federation of Public Employees, 437 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), where the claimant quit work based on personal safety fears, the court noted that the employer had sole and absolute control over whether the claimant was required to work alone in a vacant building in a suspect neighborhood. Co…