HARRY JAMES LASTINGER, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant's guilty plea was invalid because he was not properly advised of his right to appointed counsel.
The defendant pleaded guilty to two felonies and later moved to vacate his sentences, alleging he was never advised of his right to counsel. The recor…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Vacation Of Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This appellant pleaded guilty to an information charging him with two felonies involving a United States Treasury check, Sections 1708 and 495 of Title 18, U.S.C.A. Eight months later he moved for vacation of sentences pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A., Section 2255. He alleged that “at no time, in either the pre-trial proceedings or in the trial itself, was Mov-ant either advised of his right to have counsel appointed for him by the Court or offered the assistance of legal counsel”. The District Court denied the motion for the reason that “the files and records of the case conclusively show the petitioner is entitled to no relief”. Appeal to this Court was allowed in forma pauperis.
An examination of the record reveals' that the following occurred in open court at the time this appellant waived indictment, waived venue, and pleaded guilty:
“Mr. Chadwick (Assistant U. S. Attorney). I will ask you if you have an attorney?
“The Defendant. No sir. “Mr. Chadwick. Do you want one ?
“The Defendant. No sir.”
This is all that was said on the subject. Appellant was not advised of his right to counsel. Neither was he informed that if he desired counsel and was unable to obtain it then the Court would provide it for him.
This failure invalidated the plea and all subsequent proceedings. Harvey v. State of Mississippi, 5 Cir., 1965, 340 F. 2d 263, 269. Davis v. Holman, 5 Cir., 1965, 773 F. 2d 354.
The sentences, therefore, must be vacated, and we do not reach the other questions raised by this appeal.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McGARRAH v. Dutton, 381 F.2d 161 (5th Cir. 1967)
-
Molignaro v. Dutton, 373 F.2d 729 (5th Cir. 1967)
-
Stubblefield v. Beto, 399 F.2d 424 (5th Cir. 1968)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Harvey v. State OF Miss., 340 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1965)