HENRY MONROE, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
HENRY MONROE, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
359 F.2d 380
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Appellant asserts questions in a proceeding brought under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 which were assigned as error on the direct appeal of his case. Each was there decided adversely to him. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 320 F. 2d 277, cert. den., 375 U.S. 991, 84 S.Ct. 630, 11 L.Ed.2d 478. We are not convinced that the ruling then made was incorrect. The disposition of affirmance comes well within the teaching of Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Monroe v. United States, 435 F.2d 160 (5th Cir. 1970)
-
Monroe v. United States, 389 F.2d 1005 (5th Cir. 1968)
Authorities Cited
- Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1963)
- Monroe v. United States, 320 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1963)
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 375 U.S. 991 (U.S. 1964)
- Monroe v. United States, 375 U.S. 991 (U.S. 1964)