LUTHER W. WHITE, III, ADMINISTRATOR C.T.A. OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD E. MEEKS, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
LUTHER W. WHITE, III, ADMINISTRATOR C.T.A. OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD E. MEEKS, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
359 F.2d 989
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1966)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
This case was here once before after the entry of summary judgment for the defendant. White v. United States, 4 Cir., 317 F. 2d 13. We vacated the summary judgment and remanded the case for trial on the issue of negligence. Thereafter, a full plenary hearing was had and evidence, including the testimony of expert witnesses, was introduced by both parties. Thereafter, the District Court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and, upon their basis, it again entered judgment for the defendant.
We accept the District Court’s findings of fact as not being clearly erroneous, and, on the basis those findings provide, its ultimate conclusion that there was no negligence in the care and treatment of Meeks.
While the issue would be highly debatable if before us de novo, we find no reversible error in the record.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Raye Dinnerstein v. United States, 486 F.2d 34 (2d Cir. 1973)
-
Eanes v. United States, 407 F.2d 823 (4th Cir. 1969)
-
Partridge v. TWO Unknown Police Officers OF the City OF Houston, 751 F.2d 1448 (5th Cir. 1985)
Authorities Cited
- White v. United States, 317 F.2d 13 (4th Cir. 1963)