SUNLAND CENTER AT MIAMI AND CRAWFORD & CO., APPELLANTS,
v.
EARLENE BROWN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this workers' compensation case, the court reversed a deputy's award of additional temporary disability benefits granted on remand, holding that the claimant had already reached maximum medical improvement as of the original 1980 order, and the deputy exceeded the scope of the remand by making a contrary finding.
The court held that the claimant had reached maximum medical improvement as of October 28, 1980, the date of the original deputy's order, and the deputy's 1982 award of further temporary disability benefits exceeded the mandate on remand and was therefore reversed.
[1] A deputy commissioner exceeds the court's mandate on remand by making a contrary finding to a prior order and affirming judgment that recognized claimant had obtained per…
[2] An award of further temporary disability benefits is vacated when the claimant had previously reached maximum medical improvement.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In making a contrary finding in 1982, and in awarding further temporary benefits, the deputy exceeded the court's mandate on remand.”
Establishes that the deputy violated the scope of the remand by re-deciding the permanency issue
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceClaimant suffered a 1977 work-related injury. In October 1980, a deputy awarded permanent partial disability benefits of 27 percent based on physical …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Modification Of Prior Order cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This workers’ compensation claim arises from a 1977 injury. In a previous order entered October 28,1980, the deputy found that claimant had a permanent partial disability of 27 per cent of the body, based on physical impairment of 15 per cent of the body for orthopedic and neurological complaint to her back, two per cent of the body regarding her left ear, and 10 per cent of the body for psychiatric problems. In finding permanent psychiatric impairment, the deputy essentially accepted the testimony of Dr. Beasley and rejected that of Dr. Stillman, failing, however, to determine the date of maximum medical improvement. Accordingly, this court reversed and remanded for that determination, stating that the deputy might “take further evidence as may be absolutely necessary for the limited purpose of determining the date of total maximum medical improvement.” Brown v. Sunland Training Center, Division of Risk Management, 409 So. 2d 1080, 1080-1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
At the hearing on remand, claimant again presented Dr. Stillman, who testified that claimant’s psychiatric impairment maximally improved by April 15, 1982— nearly two years, it will be noted, after the prior award of permanent disability benefits. Despite having rejected Dr. Stillman’s opinion in 1980, the deputy in 1982 accepted his estimate of maximum medical improvement — there being no other testimony directly answering the question on remand— and so awarded further temporary total disability benefits from July 1, 1980, until April 15, 1982.
This was error, for both the deputy’s 1980 order and this Court’s affirming judgment recognized that claimant had obtained permanency, and hence maximum medical improvement. In making a contrary finding in 1982, and in awarding further temporary benefits, the deputy exceeded the court’s mandate on remand. We therefore conclude that claimant previously reached maximum improvement on October 28, 1980, the date of the deputy’s prior order, and we vacate the 1982 award of further temporary disability benefits. This, however, is without prejudice to claimant’s right, if the facts warrant, to petition for modification of the 1980 order as we have amended it, claiming entitlement to additional temporary disability benefits.
REVERSED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Earlene Brown v. Sunland Training Ctr., 409 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)