PACIFIC ELECTRICORD COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT
PACIFIC ELECTRICORD COMPANY, PETITIONER,
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT
361 F.2d 310
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1966)
Caution
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon an examination of the whole record we conclude that there was substantial evidence from which the Board could infer that the activities leading to the employee’s discharge were engaged in with or on behalf of other employees, and not solely by and on behalf of the discharged employee himself, and thus were “concerted activities for the purpose of * * mutual aid or protection” within the meaning of section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, protected by section 8 (a) (1) of the Act.
The order of the Board will be enforced.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Prill v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
-
Ill. Ruan Transp. Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 404 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1968)
-
Royal Dev. Co., Ltd. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 703 F.2d 363 (9th Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence