IN RE ESTATE OF ARTHUR E. DAVIS, DECEASED

Fla. 4th DCA | 1983-10-12
No. 81-2241
ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
438 So. 2d 543 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

It was the intent of this court by our original opinion, 428 So. 2d 774 (Fla.App.1983) to effect a temporary relinquishment of jurisdiction for the purposes expressed in that opinion.

At such time as the trial court enters a subsequent judgment, we shall entertain briefs in accordance with the following schedule:

1. Appellant’s brief to be served within 20 days of rendition.

2. Appellee’s brief to be served 20 days thereafter. 3. Appellant’s reply brief to be served 20 days thereafter. ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In re Est. OF Arthur E. Davis, 462 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
    …the statute. I find it an anathema for a beneficiary to be present during execution of a will or when an attorney is discussing a prospective will with a testator client. . In re Estate of Davis, 428 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), as clarified at 438 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) . See the underlying statutory basis; namely, section 733.107, Florida Statutes (1975), which provides: Burden of proof in contests. — In all proceedings contesting the validity of a will, the burden shall be upon the proponent…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw