HARRY T. HILSMAN, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
BARBARA PAULETTE HILSMAN, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
HARRY T. HILSMAN, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
BARBARA PAULETTE HILSMAN, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
438 So. 2d 880
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Based on the authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980), we affirm the final judgment of dissolution in all respects except for the provision which requires the former husband to maintain life insurance for the benefit of each child “during the child’s minority and through college.” (Emphasis supplied). On remand, we direct the trial court to delete the phrase, “and through college.” See Blum v. Blum, 382 So. 2d 52 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Kern v. Kern, 360 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and WES-SEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Angle v. Angle, 506 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…t the trial court to strike the provisions of the amended final judgment ordering the husband to provide for medical expenses for the minor child, Robert Angle, during the time he attends undergraduate college after his majority. Hilsman v. Hilsman, 438 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed. Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded with directions. CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Blum v. Blum, 382 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Haddox v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. & Renette Rousseau, 360 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Kern v. Kern, 360 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)