JAMES E. GARRISON, APPELLANT,
v.
ALONZO L. LACEY, SPECIAL AGENT, E. M. GARNETT, U. S. COMMISSIONER, AND MR. BAYLARK, U. S. MARSHAL, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that an order dismissing a complaint but not the action is nonappealable for lack of a final judgment.
Plaintiff sued federal officials for false arrest and arraignment. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss the complaint but not the action. Pla…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Arraignment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant-plaintiff Garrison sued various federal officials alleging false arrest and arraignment. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss.
Garrison was charged with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312, found guilty by a jury, and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. On appeal the judgment was affirmed. See Garrison v. United States, 10 Cir., 353 F. 2d 94. Circumstances related to this criminal case form the basis for the civil action with which we are now concerned. The instant action was brought while Garrison was a prisoner in a federal penitentiary. On this appeal Garrison’s appointed counsel argues only that the district court erred in appointing an attorney in this civil case as a friend of the court to review Garrison’s claims instead of appointing an attorney as an advocate. Although under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) the court may appoint an attorney for an indigent, it is not required to do so. The Constitution does not force a lawyer on a litigant. See Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279, 63 S.Ct. 236, 87 L.Ed. 268. The record shows that Garrison chose to be his own lawyer. The hazards which beset a layman when he seeks to represent himself are illustrated by this appeal. The record contains no final judgment. The order sought to be reviewed dismissed the complaint but did not dismiss the action. Hence it is nonappealable. See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 319 F. 2d 53, certiorari denied 379 U.S. 989, 85 S.Ct. 702, 13 L.Ed.2d 610.
Appeal dismissed for lack of a final judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bethea v. Crouse, 417 F.2d 504 (10th Cir. 1969)
-
United States v. Masters, 484 F.2d 1251 (10th Cir. 1973)
-
United States v. Pinkey, 548 F.2d 305 (10th Cir. 1977)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Adams v. United States ex rel. McCANN, 317 U.S. 269 (U.S. 1942)
- Garrison v. United States, 353 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1965)
- Coffee Cnty. v. City of Tullahoma, 379 U.S. 989 (U.S. 1965)
- Guiberson Corp. v. Webber, 379 U.S. 989 (U.S. 1965)
- Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City OF Tulsa, 319 F.2d 53 (10th Cir. 1963)