OLIVER J. VICKNAIR, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
RAYMOND E. NEUMAN, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SEVENTH COMPENSATION DISTRICT, BUREAU OF EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1966-06-23
No. 22978
362 F.2d 832 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Appellant brought this action under the provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. His complaint in the district court sought review and setting aside of a compensation order entered by appellee.

After a hearing, appellee found that appellant had not sustained an injury in the course of his employment and further found that appellant had failed to give his employer the requisite notice of the alleged injury. The standard for reviewing the findings of the Deputy Commissioner is that “the findings are to be accepted unless they are unsupported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.” O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 1951, 340 U.S. 504, 508, 71 S.Ct. 470, 472, 95 L.Ed. 483. This standard of judicial review applies also to inferences drawn by the Deputy Commissioner. O’Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Assocs., Inc., 1965, 380 U.S. 359, 362, 85 S.Ct. 1012, 13 L.Ed.2d 895. The district court properly applied this standard of review. We agree with the district court that there is ample evidence to support the ap-pellee’s findings.

The judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw