CHARLES EUGENE HAYTER, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
CHARLES EUGENE HAYTER, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
362 F.2d 973
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1966)
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction of appellant on a bank robbery charge is affirmed. The government’s case was that Hayter drove the get-away ear as part of a robbery of a national bank. The appellant appeals and says the evidence was insufficient. A review of the record shows it sufficient for a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Appellant also complains of the rejection of his tendered instruction on circumstantial evidence, which in effect said that a defendant must be found guilty on circumstantial evidence only if the case removes all doubt. Beyond a reasonable doubt is sufficient. The jury was fairly instructed on circumstantial evidence. See Strangway v. United States, 9 Cir., 312 F. 2d 283.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134 (6th Cir. 1970)
-
Keener v. Ridenour, 594 F.2d 581 (6th Cir. 1979)
-
Terrell v. Perini, 414 F.2d 1231 (6th Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Strangway v. United States, 312 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1963)