OCEANIC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
LANTANA BOATYARD, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1983-10-05
No. 82-110
ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and SHA-HOOD, GEORGE A., Associate Judge, concur.
438 So. 2d 948 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*949] PER CURIAM. This case was previously before the court and is reported as Oceanic International Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). In accord with our mandate, the trial court recomputed damages “by substituting a commission of $3,000 per boat for the original five per cent per boat,” and entered a final judgment in favor of Oceanic International Corp. for $51,000. During the present appeal, both parties agreed that there was a $1,000 error in the sum due appellant and that, if affirmed, the final judgment should be for $52,000. Accordingly, as modified, the final judgment on mandate is AFFIRMED. ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and SHA-HOOD, GEORGE A., Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Turner v. Amparo Bustamante, 493 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …ndings and conclusions are otherwise supported by the record they will not be disturbed. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc, 418 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Oceanic International Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), modified, 438 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). The judgment on Turner and Larkins’ counterclaim is also affirmed. Our view is that the counterclaim failed to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted. The disposition of this appeal does not bar an action by…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw