HOWARD TAFT MILLER, APPELLANT,
v.
HAROLD A. COX, WARDEN, NEW MEXICO STATE PENITENTIARY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the prisoner was not entitled to relief on his habeas corpus petition.
A state prisoner sought federal habeas corpus relief, claiming he was denied counsel before interrogation and that a coerced confession was used again…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Escobedo V. Illinois cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Miller, a prisoner in the New Mexico penitentiary, is serving a life sentence imposed in 1950 after a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree. On his petition for federal habeas corpus the district court held an evidentiary hearing and denied relief.
The claim is that he was not afforded counsel prior to police interrogation and that a coerced confession was used against him at his state court trial. The first point is answered by Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882, which denies retroactive application of the principles announced in Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977, and in Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.
On conflicting evidence the district court held that no coercion was used. The absence of a transcript of the proceedings at the jury trial does not detract from such finding. The unavailability of such transcript was due to the death of the reporter and the disappearance of his notes. It did not occur through any fault of the state. See Gallegos v. Cox, 10 Cir., 358 F. 2d 703. At the murder trial the prisoner testified in his own behalf. The instructions, which have been preserved, show that the voluntariness of the confession was properly considered and determined adversely to him.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pepperell Mfg. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 403 F.2d 520 (5th Cir. 1968)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gold Spot Dairy, Inc., 432 F.2d 125 (10th Cir. 1970)
-
United Steelworkers OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 393 F.2d 661 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1966)
- Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (U.S. 1964)
- Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 (U.S. 1966)
- Gallegos v. COX, 358 F.2d 703 (10th Cir. 1966)