ARTHUR PRUITT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A conviction for possessing an unregistered firearm under 26 U.S.C. § 5851 is valid even if the registration statute, 26 U.S.C. § 5841, was later deemed unconstitutional.
Appellant pleaded guilty to possessing an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5851. He later sought to vacate his sentence, arguing he wa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unregistered Firearm cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from an order of the District Court denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence filed under Title 28, Sec. 2255, U.S.C. Appellant had entered a plea of guilty in the District Court to an indictment charging that he did possess a firearm which was not registered according to law in violation of Title 26, Sections 5851 and 5861, U.S.C. He was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and ten months.
Pruitt claims that when he entered his plea of guilty, he was unaware that the section of the Code providing for registration of firearms (Title 26 U.S.C., § 5841) had been declared unconstitutional as requiring one in his situation to incriminate himself. Russell v. United States, 306 F. 2d 402 (9th Cir. 1962). He also relies on Dugan v. United States, 341 F. 2d 85 (7th Cir. 1965); United States v. Fleish, 227 F.Supp. 967 (D.C. Mich.1964); McCann v. United States, 217 F.Supp. 751, 752 (D.C.Colo.1963).
Russell and the other eases relied on by Pruitt charged violation of the registration section, § 5841. Pruitt was charged in the present case with possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of Section 5851. Section 5861 merely prescribes the penalty. The gist of Pruitt’s offense was not that he failed to register the firearm, but that he possessed a firearm which had not been registered.
This distinction was pointed out in later decisions by the Ninth Circuit, which had decided Russell. They upheld convictions under Section 5851. Frye v. United States, 315 F. 2d 491 (9th Cir. 1963); Starks v. United States, 316 F. 2d 45 (9th Cir. 1963). In Sipes v. United States, 821 F. 2d 174 (8th Cir. 1963) the Court followed Frye and Starks.
We applied the same rule to an indictment under Section 5855 charging unlawful transportation of unregistered firearms in interstate commerce. United States v. Forgett, 349 F. 2d 601 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 926, 86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 845 (1966). See also Lovelace v. United States, 357 F. 2d 306 (5th Cir. 1966).
Since Pruitt was charged with violation of Section 5851, he is not in position to attack the constitutionality of Section 5841. The decisions on which he relies are inapplicable.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85 (U.S. 1968)
-
United States v. Thompson, 420 F.2d 536 (3d Cir. 1970)
-
Deckard v. United States, 381 F.2d 77 (8th Cir. 1967)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Russell v. United States, 306 F.2d 402 (9th Cir. 1962)
- Lovelace v. United States, 357 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1966)
- Frye v. United States, 315 F.2d 491 (9th Cir. 1963)
- Starks v. United States, 316 F.2d 45 (9th Cir. 1963)
- World Airways, Inc. v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 383 U.S. 926 (U.S. 1966)
- Nesbitt v. United States, 383 U.S. 926 (U.S. 1966)
- Bennie Lee Dugan v. United States, 341 F.2d 85 (7th Cir. 1965)
- United States v. Valmore J. Forgett, Jr., 349 F.2d 601 (6th Cir. 1965)