MANUEL SANTANA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellants Hale and Rios appeal their convictions for robbery with a deadly weapon. The appellate court affirms their convictions and sentences but strikes court cost assessments that were imposed without proper notice or opportunity to object.
The convictions are affirmed based on sufficient evidence and proper admission of the statements. However, the court costs imposed without notice and opportunity to object are struck from the judgments, without prejudice to the state to tax these costs through proper procedures.
“we find no merit in the contentions that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the convictions and that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting the statements made by appellant Rios and overheard by Officer Lash”
Establishes that the court found sufficient evidence for conviction and proper admission of statements
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellants Hale and Rios were convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon under Florida law. Officer Lash overheard statements made by appellant Rios. A…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968); Spenkelink v. Wainwright, 578 F. 2d 582 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied mem., 440 U.S. 976, 99 S.Ct. 1548, 59 L.Ed.2d 796 (1979); Breedlove v. State, 413 So. 2d 1 (Fla.), cert. denied mem., - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 184, 74 L.Ed.2d 149 (1982); Adams v. State, 412 So. 2d 850 (Fla.), cert. denied mem., - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 182, 74 L.Ed.2d 148 (1982); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So. 2d 332 (Fla.1982); Riley v. State, 366 So. 2d 19 (Fla.1978), cert. denied mem.,-U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 317, 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982); Jackson v. State, 419 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Mainor v. State, 415 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Hicks v. State, 414 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Monarca v. State, 412 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Fields v. State, 379 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Mahone v. State, 222 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited (15 total)
- Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (U.S. 1968)
- Steinhorst v. State, 412 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1982)
- Spinkellink v. Louie L. Wainwright, 578 F.2d 582 (5th Cir. 1978)
- Wardell Riley v. State, 366 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 1978)
- Coffman Realty, Inc. v. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc., 413 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1982)
- McArthur Breedlove v. State, 413 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1982)
- Rowan v. United States, 440 U.S. 976 (U.S. 1979)
- Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug Admin., 440 U.S. 976 (U.S. 1979)
- Adams v. State, 412 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1982)
- Jackson v. State, 419 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)