NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
TOWER IRON WORKS, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court enforced the order prohibiting the employer from recognizing a union unless it wins a Board-conducted election.
The employer was misled by respondent into believing a multi-employer association still existed after a strike and dissolution. Independent Metal Fabr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
The order forbidding respondent employer from recognizing Independent Metal Fabricators Union unless and until it wins a Board-conducted election will be enforced. Without reaching other matters discussed in the Board’s opinion, we agree that the respondent breached the duty of neutrality placed upon it by section 8(a) (2) of the National Labor Relations Act.1
Briefly, the Iron Workers union
had been dealing with a multi-employer association of which respondent had been a member for over ten years. In the aftermath of unsuccessful negotiations for a new contract, followed by a strike, the association was dissolved. The Iron Workers union was not notified of this dissolution, but, rather, was affirmatively misled by respondent into believing that the association was still in existence. As a result Iron Workers continued to attempt to deal with the association rather than its individual members, including respondent.
In the meantime Independent conducted an organizing campaign among respondent’s employees. Having obtained a card majority, it made a demand for recognition by the respondent, which was promptly granted. Immediately thereafter respondent and Independent entered into a collective bargaining agreement. Since Iron Workers had no knowledge of the dissolution of the association, it had no reason to believe that respondent’s employees had become an appropriate unit which it should attempt to organize separately. Respondent’s conduct was not a mere recognition of a fait accompli, as in NLRB v. Air Master Corp., 3 Cir., 1964, 339 F. 2d 553. As the Board found, respondent “not only frustrated any further joint bargaining, but also deterred Iron Workers from separate bargaining.” Possibly Independent would have succeeded in organizing respondent’s employees in any event, but by leading Iron Workers not to enter the competition, respondent improperly handicapped that union until it was too late.
. 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (2).
. Local 523, International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, AFL-CIO.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Playskool, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 477 F.2d 66 (7th Cir. 1973)
Authorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. AIR Master Corp., 339 F.2d 553 (3d Cir. 1964)