WILLIE FLOYD LAW, APPELLANT,
v.
DR. GEORGE J. BETO, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
WILLIE FLOYD LAW, APPELLANT,
DR. GEORGE J. BETO, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
370 F.2d 369
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1966)
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The only substantial question raised on this appeal is the correctness of the judgment of the trial court denying the writ of habeas coipus to appellant on the ground that the state court had permitted introduction into evidence of a confession claimed to be involuntary.
Without reaching the question of voluntariness of the confession, we conclude that this case is controlled by our recent opinion in White v. Beto (5 Cir.) 367 F. 2d 557, Dec. Oct. 24, 1966 in which it was held that “the guilty plea under the circumstances is conclusive as to defendant’s guilt, admits all the facts charged and waives all non-jurisdictional defects in the prior proceedings.”
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kimbrough v. Beto, 412 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1969)
-
Miles Edward Haynes v. United States, 372 F.2d 651 (5th Cir. 1967)
-
Tuggle v. Beto, 374 F.2d 618 (5th Cir. 1967)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- White v. Beto, 367 F.2d 557 (5th Cir. 1966)