GRAHAM P. BARNHART, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
E. L. MAXWELL, WARDEN, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

6th Cir. | 1967-01-12
No. 17195
371 F.2d 583 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1967)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is a habeas corpus case. The facts are stated in some detail in Barn-hart v. Maxwell, 2 Ohio St.2d 308, 208 N.E. 2d 752.

The district court denied the writ without a hearing, on the ground that the petitioner alleged no facts or details to indicate in what manner he contends he is restrained illegally of his liberty. In the absence of such allegations, an evi-dentiary hearing is not required. Reams v. Davis, 333 F. 2d 430 (C.A. 6); Loum v. Underwood, 262 F. 2d 866 (C.A. 6).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw