BILLIE LEE MAYNARD, APPELLANT,
v.
MAURA K. MAYNARD, APPELLEE
BILLIE LEE MAYNARD, APPELLANT,
MAURA K. MAYNARD, APPELLEE
439 So. 2d 971
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
MILLS, Judge.
Husband appeals from the trial court’s order which awarded his interest in the marital home to the wife as lump sum alimony. Having studied the record and briefs of the parties, we do not feel that the trial court abused its discretion in this case. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).
AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Bennett, 565 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)…remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Reversed. SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur. . We find only two post-amendment cases debating what sort of structure may constitute a "dwelling." Herbert v. State, 439 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), held that a motel room is a “dwelling" by virtue of section 810.011(2) as amended. On the other hand, in P.P.M. v. State, 447 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), we held that a vacant house was not a dwelling for purposes of the arso…
-
L.C. & C.F. v. State, 579 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…evertheless, the appellants’ adjudications on the count of burglary of a dwelling must be affirmed because, under the common-law definition, the house burglarized in this case would still meet the definition of a dwelling. See e.g. Herbert v. State, 439 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (motel room is a “dwelling” within meaning of section 810.011(2), without regard for whether it has been rented out at the time of the offense). A house which otherwise is a dwelling under common law does not lose that character…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)