CHARLES ATWOOD D/B/A MIRACLE STRIP SECURITY SERVICE AND KENT INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,

v.

RUBEN HENDRIX, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Parrish v. Dougherty, 505 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …was insufficient to support a judgment against her. Because this issue was not presented to the trial court, and thus was not preserved for appellate review, we decline to address it. Dober v. Worrell, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla.1981); Atwood v. Hendrix, 439 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Finally, appellants argue that the trial court erred in awarding both liquidated and [*649] actual damages for the same injury. For the reasons now discussed we agree that this ruling was error. First, we note that the obligat…
• Multitech Corp. v. ST. Johns Bluff Inv. Corp., 518 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …l not consider or rule upon questions that were not presented to the trial court, we do not address St. Johns’ purported lack of standing to enforce the provisions of the contract. See Dober v. Worrell, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla.1981); Atwood v. Hendrix, 439 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Multitech asserted that St. Johns lacked standing to enforce the provisions of the contract because it was not listed as seller on the closing statement. The record reflects that this specific standing argument was not raised in…
• D'Anna v. State, 453 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …tion of the defendant rendered in-court, Loftin, supra at 71, whether the photographs were “cropped” so as to hide the identity of the photographing agency, Houston v. State, supra at 469, whether a curative instruction was given, Marshall v. State, 439 So. 2d 973, 974 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and the extent to which the photographs or reference to them at trial refer to a defendant’s past criminal record. Sims v. State, 444 So. 2d 922 (Fla.1983); see also Loftin v. State, supra at 71, (question is the extent to w…

Authorities Cited

• Chirogianis v. Anderson, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 1981)