FEATURE SPORTS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
FEATURE SPORTS, INC., APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
374 F.2d 890
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Faithful to our very restrictive mandate to determine on the existing record whether, before the initial deposit with Bank Germann there was any contract between Feature Sports, Inc. and Johansson which provided for the delivery of the advances of $250,000 into an escrow account, Johansson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 336 F. 2d 809, 816, the Trial Judge did just that. With an ample articulation of the reasons leading to it, the Judge concluded and flatly declared that no such contract existed.
That finding, we earlier said, would put an end to the Taxpayer’s case.1 336 F. 2d 809, 817.
And so it does.
Affirmed.
. This is the law of the case. See Lincoln Nat’l Life Ins. Co. v. Roosth, 5 Cir. 1962, 306 F. 2d 110 (en banc), cert, denied 372 U.S. 912, 83 S.Ct. 726, 9 L.Ed.2d 720.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Ingemar Johansson, 447 F.2d 702 (5th Cir. 1971)
Authorities Cited
- The Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. Roosth, 306 F.2d 110 (5th Cir. 1962)
- Gorham & Johnson, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 372 U.S. 912 (U.S. 1963)
- Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. Roosth, 372 U.S. 912 (U.S. 1963)
- Ingemar Johansson v. United States, 336 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1964)