HERMAN KITCHENS, APPELLANT,
v.
D. H. ALDERMAN, SHERIFF OF COULQUITT COUNTY, GEORGIA, ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Appellant sought relief from a state court conviction, Kitchens v. State, 1966, 221 Ga. 839, 147 S.E. 2d 509, by way of federal habeas corpus. The District Court erred in refusing to allow him to proceed in forma pauperis. Such refusal is an appealable order. Roberts v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 1950, 339 U.S. 844, 70 S.Ct. 954, 94 L.Ed. 1326. Appellant’s uncontroverted affidavit made out a prima facie case of indigency under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915. Adkins v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 1948, 335 U.S. 331, 69 S.Ct. 85, 93 L.Ed. 43. One of the grounds for relief is claimed systematic exclusion of Negroes from the state petit jury. This claim is not facially frivolous within the, meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915. Cf. Whitus v. State of Georgia, 1967, 385 U.S. 545, 87 S.Ct. 643, 17 L.Ed.2d 599.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. MacCOLLOM, 426 U.S. 317 (U.S. 1976)
-
Flowers v. Turbine Support Division, 507 F.2d 1242 (5th Cir. 1975)
-
Williams v. Rhoden, 629 F.2d 1099 (5th Cir. 1980)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 (U.S. 1967)
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPONT de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331 (U.S. 1948)
- Roberts v. United States Dist. Court for the N. Dist. of Cal., 339 U.S. 844 (U.S. 1950)