W. W. BATEMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA COMMERCIAL COMPANY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision and dismissed a bill in equity that sought to enjoin a tax collector from selling property for taxes levied by an allegedly illegally incorporated town. The court held that challenges to the legality of a municipal corporation must be pursued through quo warranto proceedings at law, not through equitable injunction.
A court of equity lacks jurisdiction to entertain a bill challenging the legality of a municipal corporation through injunction. The proper remedy at law for questioning the legality of a municipal corporation is quo warranto, not an equitable bill for injunction.
“the legality of a municipal corporation cannot be called in question by bill for injunction, the complainant having its remedy at law by quo warranto”
Establishes the core holding that equity cannot be used to challenge municipal incorporation; the proper remedy is quo warranto at law.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Florida Commercial Company owned real estate within the limits of Punta Gorda. On December 3, 1887, parties gathered in a billiard room and preten…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Remedy At Law cases and more on FLexlaw
Mitchell, J.
This case comes here upon appeal from DeSoto county. The complainant, Florida Commercial Company, filed its bill in the Circuit Court against the appellant, defendant below, and the bill (in substance) alleges that certain parties got together on the 3d day of December, 1887, in a billiard room at Punta Gorda, and pretended to organize and incorporate a town called Punta Gorda, and that the complainant company owned a large quantity of real estate within the limits of the town so pretended to be incorporated; that said corporation has levied a tax of one per cent, on complainant’s property inside of the limits of said town for the year 1888, and that the Collector of said town, W.
W. Bate-man, defendant in this suit, has advertised complainant’s said property for sale for the sum of $918.55, and that said Collector threatens to sell said land, and that if the said Collector is not restrained from selling said land for said taxes, he will sell them, which will place a cloud upon the title of said lands, thereby injuring them in their value, and will prevent said lands from being sold, greatly to the complainant’s injury. That the incorporation of said town is and was contrary to law, in bad faith, fraudulent, against public policy, and that all the acts of the Council of said town are illegal, of no effect, oppressive, against equity and good conscience, and there being no remedy at law, the complainant applies for relief, &c. The prayer of the bill is for an order enjoining the defendant from selling complainant’s said property for the taxes thereon for the year 1888.
A temporary injunction was granted April 4, 1889.
The bill was demurred to, first, that the complainant had not, under the allegations of the bill, pursued his proper remedy; second, that a Court of Equity has not jurisdiction of the complainant’s bill. The demurrer was overruled, and from the order overruling the demurrer, the case was appealed to this Court. The order of the Court overruling the demurrer was erroneous. The bill attempts to assail the legality of a municipal corporation upon the ground that the corporation was not legally organized, and that consequently the assessment and levy of taxes by the authorities of the town were illegal and could not be enforced. This position cannot be maintained, .because the legality of a municipal corporation cannot be called in question by bill for injunction, the complainant having its remedy at law by quo warranto. Robinson et al. vs. Jones et al., 14 Fla., 256; MacDonald et al., vs. Rehrer, 22 Fla., 198.
The decree of the Court below is reversed, and the bill is ordered dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. City of Sarasota, 92 Fla. 563 (Fla. 1926)…Robinson v. Jones, 14 Pla. 256; State v. Gleason, supra; Dillon on Munic. Corp., 5th Ed., Section 1560. Injunction does not lie to test the legal existence of a corporate franchise. Mr. Donald v. Rehrer, 22 Fla. 198; Bateman v. Fla. Commercial Co., 26 Fla. 423, 8 So. 51; Crawford v. Bradford, 23 Fla. 406; 7 Encyc. Pldg. & Prac. 416. The mention in the information of relators other than the Attorney General in a case involving the right to public office is mere surplusage. State v. Bryan, 50 Fla. 293, 39 S…
-
West v. Town of Lake Placid, 97 Fla. 127 (Fla. 1929)…attempted to be granted to this municipality may not be valid, its existence as a municipality can not be collaterally assailed in a proceeding of this nature. Merrell v. St. Petersburg, 74 Fla. 194, 76 So. R. 699; Bateman v. Florida Commercial Co., 26 Fla. 423, 8 So. R. 51; Enterprise v. State, 29 Fla. 128, 10 So. R. 740; State v. Sarasota, 109 So. R. 473; Morgan’s Ect. R. R. v. White, etc. (La.) 68 So. R. 130; Story Piano Co. v. Ottawa Circuit Judge, 179 N. W. Rep. 254; Pefifer v. Klug, 219 Pac. Rep. 498…
-
The City of Sarasota v. Skillin, 130 Fla. 724 (Fla. 1937)…to seek, by way of quo war [*730] ranto proceedings, a judgment of ouster which would remove these lands from the jurisdiction of the city for any purpose, or else seek relief by legislative action. In the case of Bateman v. Florida Commercial Co., 26 Fla. 423, 8 So. 51, the appellee sought to enjoin the tax collector of Punta Gorda from selling its lands for municipal taxes. The bill alleged that the town had not been legally incorporated and that therefore the assessment and levy of taxes by the town co…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- MacDonald v. Rehrer, 22 Fla. 198 (Fla. 1886)
- Robinson v. Jones, 14 Fla. 256 (Fla. 1873)