HIGHWAY TRUCK DRIVERS AND HELPERS, LOCAL NO. 107, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, APPELLANT,
v.
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court reviewed an order granting a new trial to a plaintiff in a personal injury action arising from a rear-end collision.
The trial court did not err in granting a new trial because the given jury instruction was prejudicially erroneous.
The plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle that crashed into the rear of the defendant's pickup truck. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
We are satisfied that Section Seven of Article 43 of the here governing Employment Agreement specifically covering employees participation in unauthorized strikes or work stoppages directly applies to the situation before us.1 The opinion of Judge Luongo in the District Court, 266 F.Supp. 868, fully presents and soundly decides the issue herein.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
it * * * ^ js specifically understood and agreed that the Employer during the first twenty-four (24) hour period of such unauthorized work stoppage shall have the sole and complete right of reasonable discipline short of discharge and such Union members shall not be entitled to or have any recourse to any other provisions of this Agreement. After the first twenty-four (24) hour period of such stoppage * * * the Employer shall have the sole and complete right to immediately discharge any Union member participating in any unauthorized * * * [work stoppage] and such Union members shall not be entitled to or have any recourse to any other provision of this Agreement.”
. In pertinent part Section 7 reads:
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Edward C. REA & 22 Ford Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 497 F.2d 577 (3d Cir. 1974)
-
Autowest, Inc. v. Peugeot, Inc., 434 F.2d 556 (2d Cir. 1970)
-
Salco Corp. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 517 F.2d 567 (10th Cir. 1975)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence