BERRY BROTHERS BUICK, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (BUICK MOTOR DIVISION)
BERRY BROTHERS BUICK, INC., APPELLANT,
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (BUICK MOTOR DIVISION)
377 F.2d 552
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
On review of the record we are of the opinion that the District Court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, General Motors Corporation (Buick Motor Division),1 in this action by Berry Brothers Buick, Inc., under the so-called Automobile Dealers’ Day in Court Act,2 which was premised on the plaintiff’s contention that the defendant did not act in “good faith”, as that term is defined in the statute, in failing to renew its sales agency fran chise at the expiration of its term. See Globe Motors, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, 328 F. 2d 645 (3 Cir. 1964); Garvin v. American Motor Sales Corporation, 318 F. 2d 518 (3 Cir. 1963).
The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.
. 257 F.Supp. 542 (E.D.Pa.1966).
. 15 U.S.O.A. §§ 1221-1225.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Edward C. REA & 22 Ford Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 497 F.2d 577 (3d Cir. 1974)
-
Autowest, Inc. v. Peugeot, Inc., 434 F.2d 556 (2d Cir. 1970)
-
Salco Corp. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 517 F.2d 567 (10th Cir. 1975)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Globe Motors, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard Corp., 328 F.2d 645 (3d Cir. 1964)
- Garvin v. Am. Motor Sales Corp., 318 F.2d 518 (3d Cir. 1963)