FORTUNA BROOM COMPANY, SOUTH TEXAS BROOM CORN COMPANY AND J. L. BECK, APPELLANTS,
v.
W. WILLARD WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1967-06-19
No. 24141
379 F.2d 327 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the employer's employees did not fall under any FLSA exemptions and affirmed the lower court's judgment ordering restitution and enjoining future violations.


Facts & Procedural History

The Employer appealed a district court judgment finding employees were not exempt under the FLSA, ordering restitution of wages, and enjoining future …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The Employer1 appeals from the judgment of the District Court after an adequate evidentiary hearing holding that the employees in question did not come within any exemption of the FLSA,2 ordering restitution of minimum and overtime wages due such employees, and enjoining 3 future violations of the Act by the Employer. We find the appeal and record wholly without any redeeming merit, but since we have expended the travail for submission, we dispose of it on its merits, or, more accurately, the lack of them, rather than dismiss as frivolous. United States v. Safety Engineering & Supply Co., 5 Cir., 374 F. 2d 885 [March 23, 1967]; see also NLRB v. Riley Aeronautics Corp., 5 Cir., 1967, 377 F. 2d 557 [June 6, 1967].

Affirmed.

. Fortuna Broom Company and South Texas Broom Corn Company, both incorporated in Texas and substantially owned, controlled and managed by J. L. Beck.

. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 213(a) (6), 213(a) (10). Nor does the Employer qualify for belatedly asserted “seasonal industry” exemption. 29 U.S.C.A. § 207 (b) (3).

. The Employer had been investigated and convicted of violating the Act in 1957. He does not here contest this portion of the order.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw