ROCKLEDGE GARDENS AND U.S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, APPELLANTS,

v.

THOMAS ROY ADAMS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Perez v. State, 566 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …n stand only if they also satisfy the Faison test and are not already inherent in the burglary and robbery charges. Faison has been applied to the crime of false imprisonment. See State v. Lindsey, 446 So. 2d 1074, 1076 (Fla.1984); Eisaman v. State, 440 So. 2d 470, 472 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). In the present case, we conclude that the Faison test has been satisfied with respect to the daughter and housekeeper under the reasoning of Rodriguez v. State, 558 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) and Sanborn v. State, 513 S…
• Lopez v. State, 688 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
  …ree attorney at sentencing. Roberts v. State, 670 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). After sentence is imposed, the burden is on a defendant to show that a “manifest injustice” has occurred. LeDuc v. State, 415 So. 2d 721 (Fla.1982); Eisaman v. State, 440 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), although there is a lesser burden before sentencing. Roberts, supra. In refusing to entertain the motion to substitute counsel until after sentencing, when it had been made known to the court that defendant contended, among othe…
• Kalapp v. State, 729 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …to sua sponte disqualify himself, and 2) imposing a sentence which departed from the sentencing guidelines without providing written reasons. Upon review, we have determined that this appeal must be dismissed under the authority of Eisaman v. State, 440 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). In Eisaman, this court explained: Under both Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b) and section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1981), a defendant who pleads guilty has no right to a direct appeal, except for such matters as…

Authorities Cited

• Acosta Roofing Co. & Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Gussie Gillyard, 402 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)