ALVIN WALLACE WILSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Armed Burglary cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury of burglary of a dwelling without a firearm and robbery, inter alia. Each of these crimes is a second degree felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Fla. Stat. §§ 810.02(3), 812.13(2)(c), 775.082(3)(c). The trial court, however, erroneously entered judgment stating that appellant had been found guilty of the crimes of burglary of a dwelling while armed, and armed robbery. Based on the errors contained in the judgment, appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of life imprisonment on each of the counts. The state concedes that the trial court erred in entering judgment and sentence because the judgment did not conform to the jury verdict. See Thornton v. Culver, 105 So. 2d 489 (Fla.1958). We therefore remand this case to the trial court for correction of the judgment and sentence in accordance with the jury verdict. See Venuti v. State, 437 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Byrd v. State, 388 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
DAUKSCH, FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and COBB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fredrick v. State, 523 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…not be combined. § 39.408(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1985). In any event, virtually all of the information contained in the HRS reports was proved by other competent evidence. In Interest of L.R.R., 455 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 5th DCA. 1984); In Interest of R.A.L., 440 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Finally, Fredrick complains that the trial court failed to order a new predisposition report. It is significant with respect to this issue that the child, K.F., was adjudged dependent on two previous occasions. We note that the…
-
In the Interest of L.R.R. and M.A.R. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 455 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)…sues under these circumstances. There is sufficient evidence to support a finding of abandonment: a remand would serve only to delay the inevitable.4 As to the court’s failure to consider a predisposition report, while in In the Interest of R.A.L., 440 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), this court did order reversal of an order of permanent commitment because the trial court failed to consider the statutorily required predisposition report, see section 39.408(2), Florida Statutes (1983),5 that case involved a d…
-
Oren Meredith v. Janies Smith, 515 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)…ds that the facts alleged in the petition for dependency were proven in the adjudicatory hearing, it is required to receive and consider a predisposition study prepared by HRS; here, a predisposition study was not prepared. In In Interest of R.A.L., 440 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), this court determined that the trial court erred in committing a child to the custody of HRS without first considering the statutorily required predisposition report. Hence, it was error, in the present case, to award temporary…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Venuti v. State, 437 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- Suggs v. Cowart, 437 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- Byrd v. State, 388 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Roscoe Jackson v. Culver, 105 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1958)
- Broxton B. Thornton v. Culver, 105 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1958)