ANTHONY SCAGLIONE NORIEGA, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
ANTHONY SCAGLIONE NORIEGA, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
382 F.2d 295
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1967)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We have carefully considered the record in this appeal from a conviction of the appellant on three counts of an information charging violation of Sections 5301(c) (2) and 5606, Title 26, United States Code.
Finding no error in the submission of the case to the jury and finding no error in the denial by the trial court of the motion for judgment n. o. v., we conclude that the judgment of conviction and sentence must be affirmed. See Stilinovic v. United States, 8 Cir. 1964, 336 F. 2d 862, and see, as to the admission of the voluntary comments by appellant at the time of the investigation, Pennewell v. United States, 1965, 122 U.S.App. D.C. 332, 353 F. 2d 870.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pennewell v. United States, 353 F.2d 870 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
- Emil N. Stilinovic v. United States, 336 F.2d 862 (8th Cir. 1964)