JAMES G. GLOVER ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES
JAMES G. GLOVER ET AL., APPELLANTS,
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES
386 F.2d 452
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We agree with the opinion and decision of the district court. In addition to the authorities there cited, see Republic Steel Corporation v. Maddox, 1965, 379 U.S. 650, 85 S.Ct. 614, 13 L.Ed.2d 580; Walker v. Southern Railway Co., 1966, 385 U.S. 196, 87 S.Ct. 365, 17 L.Ed.2d 294; Vaca v. Sipes, 1967, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S. Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842; Steen v. Local Union No. 163, 6 Cir. 1967, 373 F. 2d 519; Howard v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 8 Cir. 1966, 361 F. 2d 905. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Glover v. ST. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 393 U.S. 324 (U.S. 1969)
Authorities Cited
- Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1967)
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650 (U.S. 1965)
- Walker v. S. Ry. Co., 385 U.S. 196 (U.S. 1966)
- Howard v. ST. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 361 F.2d 905 (8th Cir. 1966)
- Steen v. Local Union NO. 163, 373 F.2d 519 (6th Cir. 1967)