CHARLES F. EXUM, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
DAMPSKIBBELSKABET TORM, A/S, APPELLEE; DAMPSKIBBELSKABET TORM, A/S, APPELLANT, V. CHARLES F. EXUM, JR., APPELLEE
CHARLES F. EXUM, JR., APPELLANT,
DAMPSKIBBELSKABET TORM, A/S, APPELLEE; DAMPSKIBBELSKABET TORM, A/S, APPELLANT, V. CHARLES F. EXUM, JR., APPELLEE
387 F.2d 639
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1967)
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Careful consideration of the record makes it plain that while the damages awarded to appellant were small in view of the possible findings of injury, the judgment awarded can not be vacated as being clearly erroneous or “unconscionably inadequate,” as charged by the appellant.
The remaining issues in the case, involving factual determinations of negligence, also being supported by the clearly erroneous doctrine can not be successfully challenged here.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Miller Redwood Co., 407 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1969)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Monroe Auto Equip. Co., 392 F.2d 559 (5th Cir. 1968)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Holly BRA OF Cal., Inc., 405 F.2d 870 (9th Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence