DONALD S. ROSE, AS TRUSTEE, APPELLANT,
v.
STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-11-15
No. 83-514
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
441 So. 2d 172 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Rabren v. Gulf Towing Co., Inc., 434 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Buckner v. Lower Florida Keys Hospital District, 403 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), pet. for rev. den., 412 So. 2d 463 (Fla.1982); Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 770, 772 (1979).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Worldwide Primates, Inc. v. McGREAL, 26 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 1994)
    …l with another. It is also true whether or not the information is requested. This rule seems to reflect the law of Florida. See Gutierrez v. Ocean Bank, 594 So. 2d 827, 828 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1992) (per curiam); Rose v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, 441 So. 2d 172 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1983) (per cu-riam); see also The Florida Bar Standard Jury Instructions Civil 85-1, 475 So. 2d 682, 691 (Fla.1985). With this view of the case, it becomes unnecessary to consider whether McGreal’s letters are protected by the Firs…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw