JAMES S. PACHECO, APPELLANT,
v.
MATTHEW CARBERRY ET AL., APPELLEES
JAMES S. PACHECO, APPELLANT,
MATTHEW CARBERRY ET AL., APPELLEES
389 F.2d 93
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Appellant’s petition for a writ of habe-as corpus was dismissed in the district court. He appeals.
One of his points is appropriate for decision here now. That is his attack on the state search warrant and the fruits thereof. We find the warrant on the facts here not infirm, but valid under United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684.
As to all other points raised here, we find Pacheco has not exhausted his state remedies.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Elson v. State, 337 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1976)
-
United States v. Lipscomb, 435 F.2d 795 (5th Cir. 1970)
-
United States v. Reid, 410 F.2d 1223 (7th Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 (U.S. 1965)