JAMES J. OESTEREICH, APPELLANT,
v.
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM LOCAL BOARD NO. 11, CHEYENNE, WYOMING, SELECTIVE SERVICE APPEAL BOARD FOR THE STATE OF WYOMING, COL. JACK P. BRUBAKER, WYOMING SELECTIVE SERVICE DIRECTOR, APPELLEE
JAMES J. OESTEREICH, APPELLANT,
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM LOCAL BOARD NO. 11, CHEYENNE, WYOMING, SELECTIVE SERVICE APPEAL BOARD FOR THE STATE OF WYOMING, COL. JACK P. BRUBAKER, WYOMING SELECTIVE SERVICE DIRECTOR, APPELLEE
390 F.2d 100
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1968)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision of the trial court and particularly in view of the jurisdictional restrictions contained in 50 App. U.S.C. § 460 (b) (3). Orderly classification of a registrant for military service is not punitive in nature. Compare United States v. Capson, 10 Cir., 347 F. 2d 959. Appellant is not denied his right to ultimate judicial review of his claimed rights. Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375, 377, 75 S.Ct. 392, 99 L.Ed. 428.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Oestereich v. Selective Serv. Sys. Local Bd. NO. 11, 393 U.S. 233 (U.S. 1968)
-
Bookout v. Thomas, 430 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1970)
-
Zigmond v. Selective Serv. Local Bd. NO. 16, 396 F.2d 290 (1st Cir. 1968)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1955)
- United States v. Capson, 347 F.2d 959 (10th Cir. 1965)