NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
DIFCO LABORATORIES, INC., RESPONDENT
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
DIFCO LABORATORIES, INC., RESPONDENT
391 F.2d 598
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The three isolated incidents and the general language employed by respondent’s agents when considered against the background facts of this case (including those set forth in N.L.R.B. v. Difco Laboratories, Inc., 389 F. 2d 663 (6th Cir. 1968) do not in the judgment of this court represent substantial evidence to support the National Labor Relations Board’s findings of threats in violation of section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1) (1964). See Suprenant Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F. 2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965).
Enforcement of the Board’s order is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Zarzour, 432 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1970)
-
Zarzour v. United States, 409 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1969)
Authorities Cited
- Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Difco Labs., Inc., 389 F.2d 663 (6th Cir. 1968)