UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
NAPOLEON FINCHER AND HENRY W. THOMAS, APPELLANTS

2d Cir. | 1968-02-15
Nos. 72, Docket 31457
391 F.2d 603 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1968)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the wagering tax and registration statutes violated the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.


Facts & Procedural History

Defendants were convicted of failing to pay a special wagering tax and failing to register as required by federal law. The government presented eviden…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM;

PER CURIAM;

Appellants, defendants below, seek reversal of judgments of conviction entered against them after a one-day trial before a judge sitting without jury.

The information contained two counts. They were charged in the first count with being in the business of accepting and receiving wagers for and on behalf of a person so engaged and with having failed to pay the special wagering tax, and in the second count with, as persons liable to pay the special tax, failing to register with the Internal Revenue that they were so liable and were so engaged in the business of receiving wagers.

The Government’s testimony conclusively showed that the defendants received wagers and that they had not paid the special wagering tax imposed under 26 U.S.C. § 4411, any tax under 26 U.S.C. § 4401, and had not registered pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 4411, 4412. Defendants offered no evidence and moved to dismiss the information on the ground that the wagering tax and registration statutes which formed the basis of the information violated the privilege against self-incrimination assured to them by the Fifth Amendment. From the denial of this motion, a quite proper disposition of it at the time, Lewis v. United States, 348 U.S. 419, 75 S.Ct. 415, 99 L.Ed. 475 (1955); United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22, 73 S.Ct. 510, 97 L.Ed. 754 (1952), defendants appealed and presented the same contentions to us.

We reverse the judgments of conviction and remand with directions that judgments of acquittal be entered, Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 19 L.Ed.2d 889 Jan. 29, 1968; Grosso v. United States, 390 U.S. 62, 88 S.Ct. 709, 19 L.Ed.2d 906 Jan. 29, 1968.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw