KATHLEEN A. FERRERO, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANK A. FERRERO, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-11-22
No. 82-2177
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
441 So. 2d 1152 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Finding that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the trial court’s action, it follows that no abuse of discretion has been shown, and the judgment may not be disturbed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1982). See Price v. Price, 389 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ruiz v. State, 462 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 1985)
    …PER CURIAM. The decision of the district court of appeal, reported as Ruiz v. State, 441 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), is approved on the authority of Maselli v. State, 446 So. 2d 1079 (Fla.1984). It is so ordered. BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.…
  • Birch v. Birch, 452 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed upon the authority of Conner v. Conner, 439 So. 2d 887 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1976); Ferrero v. Ferrero, 441 So. 2d 1152 (Fla.3d DCA 1983).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw