FELIPE A. RUIZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-11-22
No. 82-2393
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
441 So. 2d 1152 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of a probation upon the state showing of a subsequent unrelated conviction entered pursuant to a nolo contendere plea relying upon the reasoning contained in Bradford v. State, 435 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); and Maselli v. State, 425 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1983), recognizing that these opinions are in conflict with Donaldson v. State, 407 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (Cobb, J., dissenting).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw