MICHAEL DOUD GILL, APPELLANT,
v.
M. E. MILLER, APPELLEE
MICHAEL DOUD GILL, APPELLANT,
M. E. MILLER, APPELLEE
393 F.2d 22
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Concluding, as we do, that the trial court had a broad discretion in determining whether to grant or withhold immunity to a non-resident from being served with process while a subpoenaed witness at a hearing in the Southern District of Florida, Lamb v. Schmitt, 285 U.S. 222, 52 S.Ct. 317, 76 L.Ed. 720 (1932); Page Co. v. MacDonald, 261 U.S. 446, 43 S.Ct. 416, 67 L.Ed. 737; Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U.S. 128, 34 S.Ct. 44, 61 L.Ed. 192, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (U.S. 1980)
-
Glazerman v. United States, 421 F.2d 547 (10th Cir. 1970)
-
United States v. Latimer, 415 F.2d 1288 (6th Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lamb v. Schmitt, 285 U.S. 222 (U.S. 1932)
- Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1916)
- Munsey v. Webb, 231 U.S. 150 (U.S. 1913)
- The Page Co. v. MacDonald, 261 U.S. 446 (U.S. 1923)