S. C. SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
DR. GEORGE J. BETO, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
S. C. SMITH, APPELLANT,
DR. GEORGE J. BETO, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
395 F.2d 747
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
In this habeas corpus proceeding (28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 et seq.), there was an evidentiary hearing in the district court in accordance with the teachings of Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963), and Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963), and the district court made findings of fact, which were fully justified by the record, .which we could not say are clearly erroneous. Rule 52 (a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Additionally, the district judge’s conclusions of law were consistent with such findings. Hence, this case should be and is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 (U.S. 1975)
-
United States v. Bates, 600 F.2d 505 (5th Cir. 1979)
-
Davis v. M. J. Duplantis, M.D., 448 F.2d 918 (5th Cir. 1971)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 (U.S. 1963)
- FAY v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 (U.S. 1963)