STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
DONALD WADE, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1983-12-02
No. AJ-160
ERVIN, C.J., JOANOS, J., and TILLMAN PEARSON (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
442 So. 2d 309 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1983)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Understandably relying on a long history of case law requiring of a burglary charge an intent to commit a specific offense, see, e.g., State v. Speights, 417 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), quashed and remanded, 437 So. 2d 1387 (1983), the trial court dismissed the burglary charge against appel-lee. Since the trial court’s order dismissing this information, however, the Florida Supreme Court has held that a burglary information need only allege the essential element of intent to commit an offense, as does this information. State v. Waters, 436 So. 2d 66 (Fla.1983). Accordingly, this cause is REVERSED and REMANDED to the trial court with directions that the information charging appellee with burglary be reinstated.

ERVIN, C.J., JOANOS, J., and TILLMAN PEARSON (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw