J. HOWARD ARNOLD, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCES K. ARNOLD, APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1968-08-05
No. 21853
397 F.2d 810 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1968)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

We have examined appellant’s assignments of error and find no merit in them. Twice before, this court has affirmed the district court’s denial of the appellant’s petitions to review the Order of the Referee in Bankruptcy. See Arnold v. Arnold, 9 Cir., 1964, 326 F. 2d 960, and Arnold v. Arnold, 9 Cir., 1966, 356 F. 2d 873.

We affirm.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw