RONALD LEE ABRAM, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A voluntary guilty plea waives all non-jurisdictional defects and defenses, including alleged violations of constitutional rights during the proceedings.
Appellant sought habeas corpus relief, alleging his guilty plea was involuntary due to lack of warnings and promises from his attorney. The District C…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Waiver Of Non-Jurisdictional Defects cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the District Court’s denial of appellant’s petition for habeas corpus. Appellant contends that his Constitutional rights were violated in that: 1 — he was not warned of his right to remain silent; 2 — of his right to have an attorney appointed for him and 3— his plea of guilty was wrongfully induced by certain promises made by his attorney and thus the plea was not made voluntarily.
Our review of the record of the proceedings before the District Court reveals that both the United States Attorney and the District Judge took painstaking care to make certain that appellant’s guilty plea was being made voluntarily, free from threats or promises of any kind.
Having found the plea of guilty to have been voluntarily entered this constitutes a waiver of all non jurisdictional defects and defenses, United States v. Ptomey, 366 F. 2d 759 (3rd Cir. 1966).1 Thus the Court need not pass on the merits of appellant’s first two asserted complaints directed at the trial judge, appellant’s attorney and the arresting authorities.
The order of the District Court denying the Writ of Habeas Corpus is affirmed.
. A voluntary plea of guilty has been held to constitute a waiver of constitutional defenses including an inadmissible confession of a co-defendant, Watts v. United States, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 367, 278 F. 2d 247 (1960), and an illegal search and seizure, Edwards v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 152, 256 F. 2d 707 (1958). There is no contention or allegation that appellant’s plea resulted from the admissions he alleges he made to the City detectives.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State, 376 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 1979)
-
United States v. Florencio Sepe, 474 F.2d 784 (5th Cir. 1973)
-
Woodward v. United States, 426 F.2d 959 (3d Cir. 1970)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Alphonzo Edwards v. United States, 256 F.2d 707 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
- Watts v. United States, 278 F.2d 247 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
- United States v. Ptomey, 366 F.2d 759 (3d Cir. 1966)