EDWARD G. SANCHEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the statutory presumption of knowledge of illegal importation from possession is constitutional and that the appellant received effective assistance of counsel.
Appellant was convicted of selling and concealing narcotics. He appealed, challenging the sufficiency of evidence regarding his knowledge of illegal i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumption Of Knowledge Of Illegal Importation cases and more on FLexlaw
CROCKER, District Judge:
Edward G. Sanchez appeals from his conviction for violation of Title 21, Section 174 of the United States Code (sale and concealment of narcotics). This court has jurisdiction under Title 28, Sections 1291 and 1294 of the United States Code.
Appellant first alleges that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that appellant knew the narcotics were unlawfully imported. Under the provisions of Title 21, Section 174 of the United States Code, once possession is established it is presumed that the possessor had knowledge of the illegal importation. The burden then shifts to the accused to demonstrate that his possession came from a legtimate source.
In a prior ruling of this court we upheld this statutory presumption on two grounds: (1) the rational relationship between possession and knowledge of the fact of illegal importation, and (2) the relative convenience of the possessor to show a legitimate source. Hernandez v. United States (CCA 9th, 1962), 300 F. 2d 114, 118. We find no reason to alter our position here.
The second contention on appeal is that the presumption set forth in Title 21, Section 174 of the United States Code is an abridgement of appellant’s right to due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. This court has consistently held that this statutory presumption does not amount to a deprivation of constitutional rights. Morgan v. United States (CCA 9th, 1968), 391 F. 2d 237.
The third and final argument of appellant is that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. This court has held that a conviction will not be overturned on such a claim, unless defense counsel is so incompetent that the trial amounts to a mockery of the judicial system. Dalrymple v. Wilson (CCA 9th, 1966), 366 F. 2d 183, 185. The assertion that defense counsel failed to elicit testimony of an exculpatory nature while the appellant was on the stand does not render the trial a farce. There must be some showing that such evidence was available at the trial.
For these reasons we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cooper v. Fitzharris, 586 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir. 1978)
-
Ewing v. Williams, 596 F.2d 391 (9th Cir. 1979)
-
Kruchten v. Eyman, 406 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United States, 300 F.2d 114 (9th Cir. 1962)
- Jackson Morgan v. United States, 391 F.2d 237 (9th Cir. 1968)
- Dalrymple v. Wilson, 366 F.2d 183 (9th Cir. 1966)