NATHANIEL BUCHANAN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE HONORABLE JAMES A. RHODES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
In this case appellants attack as federally unconstitutional the provisions of Ohio’s constitution and statutes which provide for the election and assignment of Ohio’s trial judges. The District Judge before whom this complaint was filed dismissed the complaint without convening a three-judge court. The factual background and legal issues are fully stated in his opinion. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 249 F.Supp. 860 (N.D.Ohio 1966).
On consideration of the procedural aspects of this appeal only, the judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for the convening of a three-judge court under 28 U.S.C. § 2281 (1964).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
League OF United Latin Am. Citizens Council NO. 4434 v. Clements, 914 F.2d 620 (5th Cir. 1990)
-
Jones v. Branigin, 433 F.2d 576 (6th Cir. 1970)
-
Halferty v. Pulse Drug Co., Inc., 864 F.2d 1185 (5th Cir. 1989)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence