HAZEL TATE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PEGGY JEAN MINTON, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
RENAULT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant was subject to in personam jurisdiction under the Tennessee Long-Arm statute.
This is a products liability action for wrongful death where the defendant, a New York corporation, was served with process under the Tennessee Long-A…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse In Personam Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the ruling of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northeastern Division, that the defendant was subject to in personam jurisdiction, and overruling defendants motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Court The defendant perfected its appeal from the interlocutory order of the District Court, pursuant to the order of this Court filed November 9, 1967, granting it permission to appeal under the provisions of Section 1292(b), Title 28 of the United States Code, and Subsection 2 of Rule 8 of this Court.
This is a products liability action for wrongful death, involving the Tennessee “Long-Arm” statute, T.C.A. §§ 20-235 and 20-236; under which Renault, Inc., a New York corporation, was served with process.
Appellant relies on Velandra v. Regie, etc., 336 F. 2d 292 (6th Cir. 1964), but as was pointed out in May v. Atlas Magazines, 380 F. 2d 58 (6th Cir. 1967), Velandra did not construe the Michigan long arm statute.
We are of the opinion that this case comes within the purview of Southern Machine Co. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., 401 F. 2d 374, decided September 20, 1968, by this Court.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it is, hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Milton Margoles, M.D. v. Alida Johns, 483 F.2d 1212 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
-
Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd. v. Hollingsworth, 417 F.2d 231 (9th Cir. 1969)
-
Black v. Sheraton Corp. of Am., 564 F.2d 550 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- S. Mach. Co., Inc. v. Mohasco Indus., Inc., 401 F.2d 374 (6th Cir. 1968)
- Velandra v. Regie Nationale DES Usines Renault & Renault, Inc., 336 F.2d 292 (6th Cir. 1964)
- MAY v. Atlas Magazines, Inc., 380 F.2d 58 (6th Cir. 1967)