RICHARD L. DUGGER, APPELLANT,
v.
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLEE
RICHARD L. DUGGER, APPELLANT,
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLEE
403 F.2d 719
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1968)
Caution
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The appellant, Richard L. Dugger, brought an action against his employer, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, claiming vacation pay under Section 9 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Sec. 459. The district court concluded that any right to vacation pay must depend upon the terms of the labor agreement between the railroad and its employees. Under this agreement, the district court decided, no vacation pay should be awarded. Dugger v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, D. C.S.D.Tex.1967, 276 F.Supp. 496. From the district court judgment Dugger has appealed. The decision of the district court is sound and its judgment should be and is
Affirmed.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kasmeier v. Chicago, 437 F.2d 151 (10th Cir. 1971)
-
Foster v. Dravo Corp., 490 F.2d 55 (3d Cir. 1973)
-
Hollman v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, 435 F.2d 983 (5th Cir. 1970)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence